KIDDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS RECALL FOR FREE INFORMATION AND

This recall involves the Kidde XL Fire Extinguishers with model numbers FX210R and E-340-3 and with manufacture dates between October 2007 and April 2008. Now a Consumer Reports investigation reveals new. 'Kidde' and the model number can be found on the label on the front of the extinguisher.Consumer Reports has no financial relationship with advertisers on this site.It was one of the biggest recalls in government history: Millions of Kidde fire extinguishers were recalled in 2017 due to serious defects. Description: This recall involves the Kidde XL Fire Extinguishers with model numbers FX340SC, FX340H, FX340GW, XL5MR, FX210R, FX340SC-2, FX210W, XL2.5TCZ-4, E-340-3 and with manufacture dates between October 2007 and April 2008.

Kidde Fire Extinguishers Recall For Free Information And

Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment. вЂњIt was a great day for donuts, just one of those crisp fall days,вЂќ McDaniel later said.KIDDE FIRE EXTINGUISHER RECALL. Eastern time Monday to Friday 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM (excluding holidays) Eastern time Saturday and Sunday 9:00 AM to 3 PM.The fire that destroyed Gretchen McDanielвЂ™s new house in western Pennsylvania started one Sunday in October 2010, when she and her 4-year-old daughter settled down to make a homemade treat before her husband returned from church. The Kidde toll-free at: Call In USA 1-85. The manufacture year is on the bottom of the extinguisher.FAQ - NOTICE SAFETY RECALL for Disposable Fire Extinguishers / Push Button (Pindicator) provided by the manufacturer Kidde - 134038.

The description of the incident was culled from hundreds of pages of court records reviewed by Consumer Reports.Throughout the documents, the McDaniels alleged their fire extinguisher was defective, while also claiming the company had a practice of 'burying' consumer complaints internally, pointing to testimony by Kidde's own employees to prove their point.Kidde has faced numerous similar complaints for years. The subsequent fire ruined the home and left McDaniel with severe burns covering her body, and became the subject of a lawsuit she and her husband later brought against Kidde.Thomas Anderson, a Pittsburgh-based attorney who represented the McDaniels, declined to comment for this article, citing the coupleвЂ™s settlement agreement with Kidde. But nothing happened.In a panic, McDaniel tried to carry the pot outside, but the flames hit her in the face, causing her to drop the pan and the oil to spill. She pulled the pin to unlock the extinguisher and squeezed the handles to activate the flame retardant spray, as the instructions directed. Suddenly, the oil started to flame.McDaniel immediately reached for her fire extinguisherвЂ”a Kidde brand, model FA-110G, one of the companyвЂ™s most popular. The fire extinguishers can become clogged.After warming oil in a large covered pot on the stove and putting her 9-month-old daughter to bed, McDaniel lifted the pot's lid.

вЂњThe companyвЂ™s repeated failures, delays, and alleged misrepresentations are outrageous.вЂќ В© Provided by Consumer Reports Company Culture Put on TrialIn courts around the country going back decades, consumers have sketched out the devastating ways they allege that defective Kidde fire extinguishers changed their lives.In 1994, a Wisconsin couple alleges their home was severely damaged after an extinguisher failed to help put out a fire that started in their wood-burning stove. вЂњItвЂ™s bad enough that KiddeвЂ™s faulty fire extinguishers left people at risk for decades, but itвЂ™s downright appalling to learn how Kidde handled the issue after discovering it,вЂќ Shin says. She declined to comment on the McDanielsвЂ™ case, citing confidentiality concerns.Oriene Shin, CRвЂ™s policy counsel for product safety, says KiddeвЂ™s conduct put consumers in harm's way. In addition, the company instituted new procedures for reviewing the safety of its products, as well as ways for employees to share safety-related concerns, she says.вЂњKidde is committed to ensuring our products are safe and dependable, especially those related to life safety such as fire extinguishers,вЂќ Barrie says. And in 2015, a federal judge ruled that a reasonable jury could find вЂњKidde was recklessly indifferent as to the safety of its customers.вЂќWhatвЂ™s more, the company has seriously mishandled the recall process, according to several complaints to the CPSC: Some consumers, for example, have said that in return for their recalled products, Kidde sent defective extinguishers that also didnвЂ™t work.Kidde, which did not admit that it violated federal law as part of the settlement with the DOJ, appointed a new leadership team following the recall, says spokesperson Ashley Barrie. Yet that complaint apparently went unaddressed.

вЂњI remember saying to her, donвЂ™t worry, I will take care of this. With her daughter staring on in horror, McDaniel tried to compose herself after the extinguisher didnвЂ™t work.вЂњMy first response was to just get Alaina to stop shrieking because I knew we had a fire extinguisher,вЂќ McDaniel recounted in her deposition. McDaniel and her daughter, Alaina, had just finished whipping up the dough and cutting it into donut shapes when the fire broke out. (Kidde declined to comment, citing confidentiality concerns with litigation.)The situation that upended the McDaniels scarred the family for years, according to court documents. (The cases were either dismissed or decided in KiddeвЂ™s favor.)There have even been reports about Kidde fire extinguishers spontaneously exploding when not in use, expelling parts and chemicals, causing injuries and property damage. And in 2005, a California woman alleges she suffered life-altering injuries from a fire that started in her vehicle and couldnвЂ™t be put out by a Kidde extinguisher.

With the laundry room ablaze, blocking her way back into the kitchen, she mustered the strength to leave her house through the laundry room door and then run back in through a different entry to gather her two children, as well as the familyвЂ™s miniature dachshund. McDaniel made it to her laundry room when she realized her hands and arms were burning and the flames rose and hit her in the face, causing her to drop the pot and splash burning oil onto her legs and into a heating duct. I remember squeezing the handles together, and again, nothing happened.вЂќShe quickly dialed 911 and, in a last-ditch effort to stop the fire, tried to carry the pot outside. I was standing closer than six feet. вЂњThat is the only thing I was doing that wasn't according to directions. The extinguisherвЂ”which McDaniel had bought two years before and had wrapped and placed under the familyвЂ™s Christmas tree as a вЂњpractical giftвЂќ for her husbandвЂ”failed to work several times, court documents say.вЂњI remember thinking, I better step back,вЂќ McDaniel said during a deposition in the case.

Kidde wrote the incidents off as unrelated to the McDanielsвЂ™ case and possible evidence of user error.вЂњFire extinguishers, like many other products, are designed to be as easy to use as practicably possible given their utility, but they can be misusedвЂ”especially in the emotionally intense situation of a fire,вЂќ the company wrote in a 2015 court memo.But court records suggest that the company had more than 1,000 complaints on file for the FA-110G, the model purchased by the couple.The company, however, 'made no attempts to investigate the complaints to determine the cause of the failures,' the McDaniels argued. Numerous complaints emerged in documents released by Kidde in the discovery process as the case made its way through court. Kidde, the lawsuit said, was to blame.After the McDaniels filed their case, in 2012, the couple learned many consumers faced with similar situations felt the same.